🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are observing closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Momentum

In Europe, a growing number of countries are exploring similar bans.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that phones and apps are "robbing our kids' innocence". The policy may be enacted next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to verify the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an similar ban remains "a potential measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has called on parliament to pass a law raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a related action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised guardians to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is granted. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a solid first step," said one MEP behind the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Earlier, support grew behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have expressed warnings. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after viewing dangerous online content suggests that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to design tools that are secure and fit for young users," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, regulation is mostly unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule capping teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed measures demanding guardian approval for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and calls from certain figures to copy this example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of the West, additional countries are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global organizations adopt a more cautious stance. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

While this international conversation continues, the policies of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that governments internationally are no longer content to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.