🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.